Category: John Francis Dodge and Horace Elgin Dodge,

The Dodge Brothers – The Company and The Family – Dr. Russel Dore  @Auburn Hills Public Library

The Dodge Brothers – The Company and The Family – Dr. Russel Dore @Auburn Hills Public Library

Advertisements

Join Dr. Russel Dore for this fascinating look at the historic Dodge brothers – Their life, legacy, and company.

More information on the Dodge Brothers here on Wikipedia

1915 Model 30-35 touring car

Budd Manufacturing Co. all Steel Bodies for Dodge Brothers Cars — Reblog from The Old Motor

Advertisements

The Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company began operations in Philadelphia, PA, in 1912 manufacturing pressed steel stampings, automobile bodies, and parts. It was the fulfillment of Budd’s goal to produce all-steel automobile bodies that were more durable, stronger, less expensive and could be built in far less time than a traditional wood-framed or all wooden…

via Budd Manufacturing Co. all Steel Bodies for Dodge Brothers Cars — The Old Motor

When Dodge Bought Ford – Dodge v. Ford Motor Co

Advertisements

Excellent video from Wheelhouse on YouTube on the early Detroit rivalry between Henry Ford and the Dodge Brothers Horace and John.

 

The full story of the case can be found here at Wikipedia

Dodge v. Ford Motor Company
Court Michigan Supreme Court
Full case name John F. Dodge and Horace E. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company et al
Decided February 7, 1919
Citation(s) 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919)
Court membership
Judges sitting Chief Justice John E. Bird, Justices Flavius L. BrookeGrant FellowsFrank C. KuhnJoseph B. MooreRussell C. OstranderJoseph H. SteereJohn W. Stone
Case opinions
Decision by Ostrander
Concur/dissent Moore
Keywords

 

Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919)[1] is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers. It is often cited as affirming the principle of “shareholder primacy” in corporate America. At the same time, the case affirmed the business judgment rule, leaving Ford an extremely wide latitude about how to run the company.